Why I Write CSS Like a Design System — Even on Solo Projects
You might think a “design system” is something only big companies need. But let me tell you — even a one-page site benefits from system thinking.
I don’t wait until a site has 100 pages before I get serious about naming, organizing, or planning. I start with the assumption that every project — even the tiny ones — will grow. Because they usually do. And if they don’t? Well, good structure still saves time and headaches.
What Do I Mean by “System Thinking” in CSS?
System thinking means I don’t write CSS for the thing in front of me. I write CSS as if I’ll need to hand it off, scale it, or revise it 6 months later. That means I:
- Use
:root
variables for spacing, colors, typography, and z-index - Name my classes predictably (think
.btn-primary
, not.blue-button-3
) - Build components that rely on tokens, not hardcoded values
:root {
--text-heading: #111;
--text-body: #333;
--gap-md: 1.5rem;
--radius-sm: 4px;
--z-modal: 900;
}
This might seem like “extra work” for a small project. But here’s what happens: when a client comes back in two months and wants a design refresh, I’m not rewriting half the file. I’m swapping a few tokens, checking the layout — and shipping faster than expected.
Real-World Example: A Single Page That Became a Product
I once built a simple landing page for a client. They just wanted one section. Nothing fancy. But I coded it with a design system mindset — component names, utility tokens, variables for everything.
Two months later, they asked me to expand it into a 10-page marketing site with a pricing calculator, testimonials, and blog content. Because the system was already in place, I didn’t “start over.” I just kept building on the same foundation — fast, clean, and consistent.
That’s the power of thinking ahead. The time I “lost” writing organized CSS up front was saved tenfold on future development.
How I Do It in Practice
Here’s how I set up almost every project, whether it’s mine or for a client:
- I define core variables: spacing, type scale, color tokens, and border radius
- I write class names that describe intent — not appearance
- I build layout primitives (e.g.
.stack
,.grid
,.container
) I can reuse across components - I avoid hardcoded values unless absolutely necessary
- I keep my naming patterns consistent — and document anything unusual
This helps me switch contexts quickly. If I pause a project for two weeks, I can jump right back in without decoding what “.box2-newest
” meant.
What Happens When You Don’t Think Systematically?
I’ve inherited plenty of “quick jobs” that turned into nightmares. Inline styles everywhere. No variables. Class names like .newBtn2-blue
. It’s fine for a demo, maybe. But once clients want changes? You’re rebuilding instead of extending.
Systemless CSS feels fast — until it slows you down. Organized CSS feels like overkill — until it saves your timeline (and your reputation).
This Isn’t Just for Developers
If you’re a designer, PM, or stakeholder reading this, here’s the takeaway: a developer who codes with system thinking is doing more than shipping pages. They’re building infrastructure. That’s the difference between a freelancer and a partner.
Even if the site is small, the mindset should be large. It’s how you avoid rework, delays, and spaghetti stylesheets that scare future teammates away.
Key Takeaways
- Start small, think big: even a single page deserves structural thinking
- Use CSS variables from day one: colors, spacing, radius, typography
- Be intentional with class names: favor clarity over cleverness
- Treat your CSS like a product: not a throwaway draft
Your future self — or your next collaborator — will thank you.
Want help structuring your project like a real design system? Contact me here and let’s build something scalable — even if it starts small.